本文已被:浏览 590次 下载 133次
投稿时间:2024-11-05
投稿时间:2024-11-05
中文摘要: 为优选出多花黄精新鲜根茎加工成即食产品的理想加工设备和加工次数,设计新鲜根茎不同处理方式(A)、不同加工设备(B)、不同加工次数(C)的三因素完全随机区组试验,A设A1(去根去皮)、A2(去根带皮)2个试验水平,B设B1(现代加工设备)、B2(传统加工设备)2个试验水平,C设C0~C9共10个试验水平(其中C0为对照,即未加工根茎),分A1B1C、A1B2C、A2B1C、A2B2C 4个区组,共40个不同处理,并以浸出物、多糖、还原糖、总皂苷、总酚、总黄酮、蛋白质、粗脂肪共8种功效成分组成的根茎质量值及加工根茎的口感、色泽为总体评价指标,筛选出较优试验处理。研究表明,试验因素A、B、C及A×B、A×C、B×C、A×B×C对提高多花黄精新鲜根茎的加工质量均造成极显著影响(P<0.01)。总体上看,去皮加工的平均根茎质量值比去根带皮的提高51.59%,现代设备加工的平均根茎质量值比传统设备的提高27.83%;新鲜根茎无论是否去皮,均以加工8次的根茎质量值最优,不同加工次数的根茎质量值从高到低依次为8次>7次>9次>6次>5次>4次>3次>2次>1次>0次,说明多花黄精新鲜根茎随加工次数的增加,根茎质量值提高(P<0.01);4种不同加工方法中,A1×B1、A1×B2、A2×B1的根茎质量值分别比A2×B2提高了85.18%、40.49%和18.91%,说明传统“去目重蒸法”(A1×B2)要优于传统“九蒸九曝法”(A2×B2);较优试验处理为A1B1C8、A1B1C7、A1B1C9、A1B2C8、A1B1C6、A1B2C9,用此法制成的根茎,香甜可口、无刺喉味、断面颜色黑色至亮黑色,加工的根茎质量值比对照根茎提高了2.83~3.88倍,加工成本相对较低。多花黄精即食产品的最佳加工方法为根茎洗净、去根、去皮后加工,若用现代设备不锈钢蒸柜和烘箱,应反复蒸烘6~9次,以8次为佳;若用传统设备木制饭甑应反复蒸晒8次。
Abstract:To select the ideal processing equipment and determine processing times for processing fresh rhizomes of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua into ready-to-eat products, this paper designed a three-factor completely randomized block experiment on fresh rhizomes of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua with different processing methods (A), processing equipment (B), and processing times (C). A was set with two experimental levels of A1(peeled) and A2 (not peeled); B was set with two experimental levels of B1 (modern processing equipment)and B2 (traditional processing equipment), and C was set with 10 experimental levels of C0-C9 (C0 as the control, i.e. unprocessed rhizomes) and divided into four block groups of A1B1C, A1B2C, A2B1C, and A2B2C,with a total of 40 different treatments. The quality of rhizomes composed of eight functional components, including extractives, polysaccharides, reducing sugars, total saponins, total phenols, total flavonoids, crude protein, and crude fat, as well as the taste and color of the processed rhizomes were selected as the comprehensive evaluation indicators for the optimal experimental treatment. The research showed that experimental factors A, B, C, as well as A×B, A×C, B×C, and A×B×C, all had a significant impact on improving the processing quality of fresh rhizomes of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua (P<0.01). Overall, the quality of peeled rhizomes increased by 51.59% compared to non-peeled ones, and the quality of rhizomes processed by modern equipment increased by 27.83% compared to that by traditional equipment. The quality of fresh rhizomes,whether peeled or not, was the best after being processed eight times. In terms of processing times, the quality of rhizomes in descending order was sorted: 8 times >7 times>9 times>6 times >5 times >4 times>3 times >2 times>1 time>0 times, indicating that the overall quality of rhizomes of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua increased significantly with the increase in processing times (P<0.01). Among the four different processing methods, the quality of rhizomes in A1×B1, A1×B2, and A2×B1 increased by 85.18%, 40.49%, and 18.91%,respectively compared to that in A2×B2, indicating that the traditional deseeding and re-steaming method (A1×B2) wassuperior to the traditional nine-steaming and nine-exposure method (A2×B2). The optimal experimental treatments were A1B1C8, A1B1C7, A1B1C9, A1B2C8, A1B1C6, and A1B2C9. The rhizomes produced by these methods had a sweet and delicious taste, caused no irritation to the throat, and showed a black to bright black color. The processing quality of the rhizomes was 2.83-3.88 times higher than that of the control rhizomes,with a low processing cost. The best processing method for ready-to-eat products made from Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua was as follows: The rhizomes were cleaned, with the roots removed and the skin peeled, and then processed. If modern equipment, such as a stainless steel steamer and oven, is used, it should be steamed and dried 6-9 times, with 8 times being the best. If traditional wooden rice steaming equipment is used, it should be steamed and sun-dried 8 times.
keywords: Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua fresh rhizome processing chemical composition quality evaluation
文章编号:202517018 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:丽水市重点研发计划项目(2022ZDYF15)
| Author Name | Affiliation |
| LIU Yuejun | 1. Research and Management Center of East China Medicinal Botanical Garden, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang,China; |
引用文本:

津公网安备12011602301139号