###
食品研究与开发:2018,39(24):33-38
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
当阳地区鲊广椒品质的评价
(1.湖北文理学院食品科学技术学院鄂西北传统发酵食品研究所,湖北襄阳441053;2.当阳市食品药品监督管理局,湖北宜昌444100;3.当阳市产品质量检验检测中心,湖北宜昌444100)
Quality Evaluation of Zhaguangjiao Samples Collected from Dangyang
(1.Northwest Hubei Research Institute of Traditional Fermented Food,College of Food Science and Technology,Hubei University of Arts and Science,Xiangyang 441053,Hubei,China;2.Dangyang Municipal Food and Drug Administration,Yichang 444100,Hubei,China;3.Dangyang Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center,Yichang 444100,Hubei,China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 8002次   下载 0
投稿时间:2018-06-21    
中文摘要: 采用色度仪、电子舌、高效液相色谱仪、电子鼻和气相色谱质谱联用技术对采集自湖北省当阳市的10个鲊广椒样品品质进行初步评价。结果发现,鲊广椒样品在总酸含量、氯化钠含量、红绿度和酸味上的差异性较大,且乳酸为鲊广椒中的主要有机酸。除W6S外,其他电子鼻传感器对鲊广椒的响应值变异值均超过了30%,且醋酸、己酸乙酯、乙醇和乙酸乙酯为当阳鲊广椒中主要挥发性风味物质。由此可见,当阳地区不同农户家制作的鲊广椒品质存在较大差异。
Abstract:Product qualities of ten Zhaguangjiao samples collected from Dangyang Hubei province were studied by colorimeter,electronic tongue,high performance liquid chromatograph,electronic nose,and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer.The results showed that there were significant differences in the contents of total acid and sodium chloride,a*,and sourness,and lactic acid was majority of the organic acid in Zhaguangjiao samples.The variation values of response values of all electronic nose sensors were more than 30%except for W6S,and acetic acid,ethyl hexanoate,ethanol and ethyl acetate were major volatile components in Zhaguangjiao samples.Thus,there were significant differences of product quality among home-made Zhaguangjiao samples collected from Dangyang.
文章编号:201824006     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:湖北文理学院教师科研能力培育基金(2017kypy051)
引用文本:


用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫