###
食品研究与开发:2023,44(23):138-144
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
脱脂榛子粉标准样品的制备及其过敏原检测方法验证
(1.大连民族大学,辽宁 大连 116600;2.大连市检验检测认证技术服务中心,辽宁 大连 116021;3.中国标准化协会,北京 100048;4.中国检验检疫科学研究院,北京 102206)
Preparation of Reference Material of Degreased Hazelnut Powder and Verification of Methods for Detection of Allergens
(1.Dalian Minzu University,Dalian 116600,Liaoning,China;2.Dalian Inspection and Testing Certification Technical Service Center,Dalian 116021,Liaoning,China;3.China Association for Standardization,Beijing 100048,China;4.Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine,Beijing 102206,China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 407次   下载 275
投稿时间:2022-12-22    
中文摘要: 为解决用于食品过敏原检测的榛子标准样品缺乏的问题,将精选的榛子果仁经粉碎、正己烷脱脂、过筛处理制成呈松散状的脱脂细粉。采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(quantitative real-timepolymerase chain reaction,qPCR)法和酶联免疫吸附测定(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)法进行验证,并比较脱脂前后榛子特性值的变化,进行均匀性、稳定性检验及定值分析。制备好的符合条件的脱脂榛子粉标准样品,用于qPCR 和ELISA 检出限的验证。结果表明,未经脱脂处理的榛子粉样品Oleosin 基因Ct 值为26.22±0.47,脱脂处理后的Ct 值为25.80±0.31;经方差分析,在95%置信概率下,两种方法测定值计算得到的F 比分别为2.17 和2.10,均小于F 临界值F0.05(14,15)=2.42,表现出良好的均匀性;两种方法测定值的|b1|分别为0.011 67 和0.000 24,均小于t(0.95,n-2)×s(b1),统计量p 值分别为0.08和0.054(p>0.05);群组间统计量p 值分别为0.14 和0.27(p>0.05),稳定性良好;经验证,ELISA 方法相比qPCR 具有更好的检测灵敏度,可检测到食品中0.000 1%含量的榛子残留物。
Abstract:To solve the shortage of hazelnut reference material for food allergen detection,selected hazelnut kernels were crushed,degreased by n-hexane,and sieved to make loosely degreased fine powder.Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction(qPCR)and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)were used for confirmation,and the effects of degreasing on the characteristic values of hazelnuts before and after degreasing were compared.The uniformity,stability,and fixed value analyses were carried out.The qualified standard sample of defatted hazelnut powder was prepared and used to verify the detection limit of qPCR and ELISA.The results showed that the Ct value of Oleosin gene in the hazelnut powder sample before degreasing was 26.22±0.47,and that after defatting was 25.80±0.31.After analysis of variance(ANOVA),under the 95% confidence probability,the F ratios calculated by the two methods were 2.17 and 2.10,respectively,which were both less than the F-critical value F0.05(14,15)=2.42,showing a good uniformity.The|b1|of the measured values of the two methods were 0.011 67 and 0.000 24,respectively,which were less than t (0.95,n-2)×s(b1),and the statistical pvalues were 0.08 and 0.054(p>0.05),respectively.The p-values of the between-group statistics were 0.14 and 0.27(p>0.05),respectively,showing a good stability.The ELISA method had a better detection sensitivity than qPCR,detecting hazelnut residues at 0.000 1% in food.
文章编号:202323019     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFF0601902)
引用文本:


用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫