本文已被:浏览 686次 下载 252次
投稿时间:2022-09-13
投稿时间:2022-09-13
中文摘要: 以新疆多浪羊为研究对象,采用空气自然解冻法、腌制剂浸湿解冻法和低温变湿解冻法解冻冷冻多浪羊肉,考察羊肉的色泽、pH 值、蒸煮损失率、解冻损失率、滴水损失率、剪切力、质构特性、营养品质、感官评分、菌落总数和大肠菌群数,从而对比3 种解冻方法对羊肉品质的影响。结果表明:随着解冻时间的延长,腌制剂浸湿解冻法和低温变湿解冻法均对色泽有显著改善,腌制剂浸湿解冻法的pH 值最佳,空气自然解冻法对羊肉剪切力效果最好,腌制剂浸湿解冻法和低温变湿解冻法对羊肉菌落总数均有显著影响(P<0.05);在解冻时间48 h 时,腌制剂浸湿解冻法和低温变湿解冻法对羊肉蒸煮损失、解冻损失、滴水损失、质构特性、营养品质、感官评分均有显著影响(P<0.05);3 种解冻方法均未被大肠菌群污染。腌制剂浸湿解冻法比空气自然解冻法在各项指标及总体接受度上更具有优势,在4 ℃、80%湿度下解冻多浪羊肉时肉的品质更佳。
Abstract:With Xinjiang Duolang sheep as the research object,natural air thawing method,pickling thawing method,and low-temperature humidification thawing method were used to thaw frozen Duolang mutton,and the color,pH value,cooking loss,thawing loss,dripping loss,shear force,texture properties,nutritional quality,sensory evaluation,total number of colonies,and number of coliforms of mutton were examined.Thus,the effects of the three thawing methods on the quality of mutton were compared.The results showed that with the prolongation of the thawing time,the color of the mutton was significantly improved by the pickling thawing method and low-temperature humidification thawing method.The pH value of the mutton by the pickling thawing method was the best.The effect of the natural air thawing method on the shear force of the mutton was the best,and both the pickling thawing method and low-temperature humidification thawing method had significant effects on the total number of colonies of mutton(P<0.05).The pickling thawing method and low-temperature humidification thawing method had significant effects on the cooking loss,thawing loss,dripping loss,texture properties,nutritional quality,and sensory evaluation of mutton(P<0.05).All three thawing methods were not contaminated by coliform bacteria.The pickling thawing method had more advantages than the natural air thawing method in terms of various indexes and overall acceptability,and the meat quality was better when defrosting mutton at 4 ℃and 80% humidity.
文章编号:202323007 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:青海省科技计划项目(2020-QY-215)
作者 | 单位 |
徐天旭1,单斌2,柳絮3,毛海峰2,迟明2,刘毓超2* | 1.塔里木大学食品科学与工程学院,新疆 阿拉尔 843300;2.青海省轻工业研究所,青海 西宁 810001;3.北京市药品包装材料检验所,北京 100023 |
引用文本: