###
食品研究与开发:2021,42(20):1-7
查看/发表评论     过刊浏览    高级检索     HTML     PDF
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
不同品种鲜食型甘薯烘烤后品质的研究
(1.河北科技大学食品与生物学院,河北石家庄050018;2.河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所河北省遗传育种实验室,河北石家庄050035;3.衡水学院生物技术系,河北衡水053000)
Study on the Quality of Different Varieties of Fresh Sweet Potatoes after Baking
(1.College of Food Science and Biology,Hebei University of Science and Technology,Shijiazhuang 050018,Hebei,China;2.Hebei Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding,Institution of Cereal and Oil Crops,Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science,Shijiazhuang 050035,Hebei,China;3.Department of Biotechnology,Hengshui University,Hengshui 053000,Hebei,China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 4260次   下载 188
投稿时间:2021-04-25    
中文摘要: 为探究不同甘薯品种烘烤后的品质,以8个不同品种的甘薯为材料,测定其品种特征特性及烤制后的相关理化、感官、质构特性等指标,并对各指标进行相关性分析和主成分分析。结果表明,冀薯8号的干率最高,蛋白质含量最低;济薯26干率、总糖含量和淀粉含量均最低;冀薯7号总糖含量和淀粉含量最高;冀粉2号蛋白质含量最高;冀紫薯3号纤维素含量最高;冀元1号的纤维素含量最低。基于质构指标及主成分分析建立2个模型,得出8种甘薯质构综合得分由高到低依次为冀紫薯3号、冀粉3号、冀粉2号、烟薯25、济薯26、冀薯7号、冀元1号、冀薯8号。感官评价得出冀粉2号接受度最好,冀薯8号接受度最差。相关性分析表明营养品质、质地品质及感官品质之间具有一定的相关性。综合分析得出冀粉2号为8个甘薯品种中最优品种,其次是烟薯25、冀紫薯3号、济薯26、冀粉3号、冀薯7号、冀元1号、冀薯8号。
中文关键词: 甘薯  质构  主成分分析  相关性分析  品质
Abstract:In order to explore the quality of different sweet potato varieties after baking,eight varieties with different characteristics were used as materials,and their characteristics in relation to physical and chemical properties,sensory and texture characteristics and other indicators after baking were determined,the correlation analysis between each indicator and principal component analysis were also determined.Results showed that Jishu 8 had the highest dryness rate and the lowest protein content;Jishu 26 had the lowest dryness rate,total sugar and starch content;Jishu 7 had the highest total sugar and starch content;Jifen 2 had the highest protein content;Jizishu 3 had the highest fiber content;and Jiyuan 1 had the lowest fiber content.Two models were established based on texture index and principal component analysis,and the texture comprehensive scores of the eight sweet potato textures in descending order were Jizishu 3,Jifen 3,Jifen 2,Yanshu 25,Jishu 26 ,Jishu 7,Jiyuan 1,and Jishu 8.Sensory evaluation showed that Jifen 2 had the best acceptance,while Jishu 8 had the worst acceptance.Correlation analysis showed that there was a correlation between nutritional quality,texture quality,and sensory quality.Comprehensive analysis showed that Jifen 2 was the best among the 8 sweet potato varieties,followed by Yanshu 25,Jizishu 3,Jishu 26,Jifen 3,Jishu 7,Jiyuan 1,and Jishu 8.
文章编号:202120001     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:河北省现代农业产业技术体系创新团队项目(HBCT2018080203);河北省现代农业科技创新项目(2019-4-2-7);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-10-C1);甘薯高甜度抗根腐病专用品种选育及配套技术研究示范(19226338D)
引用文本:


用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫